Skip to content

Avoidants Always Turn Secure When You Do These 3 Things

Channel: Chris Seiter
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERIWbr-o2gI

Seiter presents a three-point "triangle" model for how an avoidant partner can shift toward secure attachment, arguing all three points must work together and that change is slow, not a 30-day fix.

Key points

  • He frames avoidance as a nervous-system "wall" built in childhood to survive intrusive or cold caregivers, not as a deliberate attempt to hurt a partner.
  • He cites a therapist's line that attachment styles are "formed, maintained, and reformed in relationships" -- claiming one cannot change attachment style alone.

Point 1: Nervous system / safety. Invokes Stephen Porges' polyvagal theory and "neuroception" -- the body unconsciously scanning a partner's tone, posture, and energy for threat. He argues a calm, non-chasing, non-shaming presence lets the avoidant's body register safety, enabling co-regulation (a regulated nervous system helping heal a dysregulated one).

Point 2: Co-regulation to self-regulation. Once past the wall, the avoidant runs unconscious "tests" (dismissive comments, pulling away, changing plans). He says most avoidants make tests almost impossible to pass, and the partner must avoid panicking or chasing.

Point 3: Boring consistency. Avoidants need predictability; warm, unshakable consistency remaps their model of relationships. He cites Hebbian learning ("neurons that fire together wire together") and Colin Blakemore's 1970 kitten experiment (kittens raised seeing only vertical or horizontal lines lost the ability to see the other) to argue repeated healthy experience rewires the brain.

  • He warns against a "patience paradox": wanting fast results, citing his decade in breakup coaching where "win your ex back in 30 days" claims (some faked with Fiverr actors) condition people to chase speed over real healing.
  • Closes with "earned secures" -- people who built secure attachment later in life -- citing a study claiming they hold up under high stress as well as continuous secures and better than insecures.

Reception

  • Mixed: appreciation for the accessible framing, but the most-liked comments push back hard on the premise.
  • Recurring critique: the model puts the burden entirely on the secure partner; avoidants must do their own work (therapy, reflection) and often grow most via solitude or a breakup, not a partner adapting to them.
  • Several report being discarded with lines like "I don't love anyone" and say they are focusing on themselves rather than waiting.
  • Some avoidants and partners affirmed it described their experience accurately; one called the "boringly consistent" point key.
  • Seiter replied that the video was made more to show avoidants that secure attachment is possible.