Skip to content

Avoidants Only Chase You When These 3 Forbidden Needs Collide

Channel: Chris Seiter
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu-_ZTsoi-E

He argues an avoidant only stops running and starts chasing when three "forbidden needs" overlap at once, illustrated as a Venn diagram. Hitting just one lever is not enough.

Key points

  • The three needs are framed as cravings the avoidant secretly wants but was taught to fear or feel ashamed of. Only their intersection creates the urgency that overrides fear.

  • Need 1: Optimal stimulation. He invokes the Yerkes-Dodson optimal arousal theory (1908): people perform best at moderate arousal, not too little (bored) or too much (overwhelmed). He claims an avoidant's "sweet spot" is razor-thin, so mild interest already feels overwhelming and they shut down.

  • He uses a "volcano" metaphor: staying in the arousal zone builds pressure until they manufacture a reason to leave. The fix is a "thrill to safety loop" -- give stimulation, then deliberately pull back and give space so their nervous system resets.

  • Need 2: The Phantom Ex Goldilocks zone. He claims avoidants chase a "Frankenstein ex" stitched from the best traits of past partners, an impossible standard that conveniently lets them avoid investing. To trigger a chase you must land in a narrow band: mysterious but warm, affectionate but not overwhelming, familiar but not predictable.

  • Need 3: Locus of control. Avoidants cling to an internal locus (belief they control outcomes) as a survival mechanism. They secretly want to share control but only if they feel they can hit the eject button. He admits he has no fully satisfying answer for fulfilling this need; meeting the first two needs is what loosens their grip.

  • Case study "Rachel": consistent no contact disrupted her ex's "flatline" (need 1); confident social posts including photos with other guys hit the Goldilocks zone (need 2); ending conversations first gave him the illusion of control (need 3), and he re-engaged.

  • He closes by asking whether constantly navigating an avoidant's triggers and suppressing your own needs is a sustainable way to live.

Reception

  • Overwhelmingly skeptical of pursuing avoidants at all; many top comments call the strategy exhausting and not worth it ("a lot of telepathic math," "easier to solve a Rubik's Cube").
  • A recurring theme: dealing with an avoidant pushed commenters from anxious toward secure, after which they lost interest in the relationship.
  • Several describe the "phantom ex" outcome from the other side -- years later the avoidant still pines while the commenter has moved on and feels relief.
  • Many endorse walking away and choosing secure partners over performing the dance "again and again forever."
  • A minority credit Chris's videos with helping them finally understand and exit the loop.