Skip to content

Your Value To A Woman | A CRP video

Channel: CRP Archive
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlotRr4J5Ps

The speaker argues that a man's attractiveness to women is not based on objective qualities but is relative to his standing in a shared social environment, so the path to attracting desirable women is to gain status within their social circle.

Key points

  • Men who see a "fat balding" guy with a hot woman wrongly conclude she is a gold digger; the speaker calls this a "sour grapes" failure to understand the situation.
  • Men judge women on objective qualities (a woman who is "objectively hot" is attractive regardless of her education or background); women do not judge men the same way.
  • Women value a man relative to his social context: if the people in her social environment treat him as important and fawn over him, she will find him attractive, even if he is unremarkable (e.g. a "big deal in the cement mixing business").
  • A good-looking man who is socially a "nobody" and does not fit her crowd will be dismissed as "really attractive, but he's nobody."
  • Practical takeaway, framed as a principle of "game": to reach a hot woman in a group, charm her friends and the lower-status members first, build value with the social circle as friends, and her attention will follow.
  • The fix is to enter the social milieu where the desirable women are and get that group to regard you highly, rather than approaching the woman directly with no shared context.
  • Value is always relative and contextual (water is worthless until you are in a desert); the speaker attributes the difference in male vs female priorities to evolution and the fact that women bear children.

Reception

  • Strongly positive; many top comments call the content clarifying and several mourn the creator, who is identified as Gonzalo Lira and is referred to in past tense (RIP).
  • Multiple men corroborate from experience: one says social-circle access let him meet women he now cannot, another describes being "ranked" by a group and only offered its least attractive single women.
  • Commenters extend the thesis, arguing status and popularity matter more than looks (one claims a roughly 0.9 correlation of a man's status to a partner's looks) and naming it "preselection" and "social proof."
  • Pushback: one says hot women with unattractive men are noticeable precisely because they are rare, so the rule is overstated; another (Ivy League) agrees status matters but says a "smooth talker" can still win without a community.
  • A recurring counter-theme questions the premise, urging men to focus on health, wealth and self rather than chasing "hot" women at all.