Skip to content

LEVELS [1: INTRODUCTION]

Channel: hoe_math (PsychoMath)
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_0Q3hVuFtc

An introduction to a "map of consciousness" - stages of psychological development, adapted from Ken Wilber's integral theory - that the creator uses to explain why people see the world so differently, why men and women clash, and why modern society feels broken: we built a high-level world but stopped growing to meet it.

Key points

The framework

  • Consciousness grows through predictable levels of psychological development. Everyone moves through them at a different speed and stops at a different place; growth depends on many factors, like a plant needing sun, air, water, and soil.
  • In places with the right ingredients the average is level four or five (about 15% at six), but the global average is level three to four.
  • The chart is the creator's interpretation of Wilber's AQAL ("all quadrants, all levels") integral map, which he calls a map of everything you can know about.
  • Core insight: the lower your level, the less you can see that other people think differently. People assume everyone thinks the way they do, which causes conflict.

Same thing seen differently

  • A fly loves what a human finds disgusting on the sidewalk - obvious. But most people struggle daily to grant that another person can see the same thing differently.
  • Applied to cheating: telling someone "my past doesn't matter to you" is low-level thinking, like telling the fly what should matter to it. Men are typically more upset by physical cheating (risk of raising another man's child while investing time and money); women are typically more upset by their partner giving investment - money, time, support, emotional bonding - to other women. Each side insists their version is worse.
  • "Thinking about thinking" is the higher-level move: a girl considering her dad's thoughts about how men think is reaching a new level.

The levels (renamed for feel)

  • Level 1 - Desire / survive: pure want, "I want a cookie." Stuck here as an adult means basically homeless.
  • Level 2 - Appease: you realize others have desires too and trade to get what you want; small groups; appeasing gods/spirits (the "angry volcano needs a virgin" example).
  • Level 3 - Control: you notice everyone is trading favors and try to direct it toward yourself (the Goodfellas "friend of mine / friend of ours" hierarchy). People stuck here commit crime, litter, don't return the shopping cart - "there is no such thing as other people."
  • Level 4 - Conform: people pick a leader and write down rules; large nations, cities, agriculture become possible; rigid, resists new ideas (Galileo vs the church). Conformity is a way to show you can submit to shared rules instead of chaos.
  • Level 5 - Achieve: with a stable way of life, people want to improve, advance, accumulate - cars, houses, money, fame; "there's no one right way, they're all made up," the start of world-citizen consciousness.
  • Level 6 - Self-discovery / include: you ask what success even is and who you are; "make your own way" stops satisfying; you try to include all the different parts of yourself. This detachment is where he expects to lose some viewers.
  • Level 7 (implied endpoint): everyone in a place that works for them and where they work for others; no more "everyone must think like me."
  • The Scumbag Steve comic and the two brothers buying mom a gift (flowers/soap vs a toy car) illustrate the level 3-to-4 jump: the lower level literally cannot grasp that another person holds a different idea.

The society thesis

  • Level six ideas (include and validate everyone) genuinely come from a high level of awareness, but get abused by people at levels 2-4 who don't understand inclusion: levels 2-3 hear "no rules anymore," level 4 hears "be inclusive or else," and level six defends them because it hates the idea of levels and wants everyone to be equal.
  • Six-level people tend to be smarter, wealthier, and more powerful, so they are insulated from the consequences - they want total inclusion but won't include those who reject total inclusion ("putting the mosque next to the gay bar and saying now you two get along").
  • When level six holds power, it prevents people from making the crucial 3-to-4 jump, producing "a generation of deservers" (tied to the "I am the table" meme - girls who feel they simply deserve what they want with no recognition of what the other person wants).
  • Steve does not need inclusion; he needs to learn other people don't think smoking in their house is cool. Forcing his hosts to accommodate him stops him from ever growing up.
  • His prescription is alignment and harmony - things working together the way they want to, not the way you want them to. His example is Dubai: people come from everywhere to live and work, no one fighting over who owns the country, included as long as they follow the rules. He has "no notes for the Masai" but doesn't want them moving to his neighborhood to impose their way either.

Note: the video is framed as social science ("many researchers have studied this") but names only Ken Wilber's integral theory; the levels are presented as established fact. It carries an explicit sponsor read for Integral Life / a Ken Wilber email course, dropped here as an ad.

Reception

  • Strongly positive; many long-tenured fans say this developmental content is what they actually want from the channel, over the viral TikTok-callout videos. "This is the actual content I personally want to see from you... one of the few psychoanalysis frameworks I can actually show to my friends, because it doesn't smell of generic personality test BS."
  • Praise centers on his ability to make an abstract framework digestible and visual: "being able to articulate and visually illustrate the human experience in a digestible way is really impressive." Several said it should be taught in schools.
  • Long personal anecdotes flooded the comments testing the model against their own lives - a kid hiding in the mall's makeup department (one level off from where searchers looked), discovering as a teen that most adults never grow past teenage-level thinking unless they consciously work at it.
  • A recurring meta-observation: some worried that left-leaning viewers would bail in the first 10 seconds over a political signal and thus miss "a very compelling explanation for why they couldn't get through the first 10 seconds"; others read it as "a very secular way of explaining the moral decline of western civilization."
  • Jokes landed well - "if mom doesn't like the toy car, it's her fault for not being cool," Scumbag Steve nostalgia, and level-flexing bits ("I already portrayed myself as the Lvl 8-Chad and you as the Lvl 3-Soyjak").
  • In a pinned-style reply the creator noted he has been building these for a long time: "6 half-done charts, and 31 pages of script"; the series rollout was highly anticipated.