Skip to content

Women chase Cheaters, Liars, and Bad Boys for THESE Reasons (Female Nature Fantasy)

Channel: Casey Zander
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtwcJJcRBFM

The speaker argues that women stay attached to men who cheat and lie because such men sustain "tension," and that commitment from any man -- even the highest-status celebrity -- kills desire by relieving that tension.

Key points

  • Central claim: women thrive on constant drama and tension; the moment a man commits monogamously, the tension is relieved and her attachment cannot be maintained.
  • Committing signals "you're good enough," revealing your sexual market value and ending your "pre-selection" status; per hypergamy she then stops looking up at you and starts looking down. Even commitment from a DiCaprio, Brad Pitt, or Drake decreases desire.
  • Closing off other options reads as neediness, not loyalty, and lowers her sexual desire rather than raising it.

What the "bad boy" supplies

  • Hardcore mystery -- she never knows where he is or whether another woman is involved -- which creates intrigue.
  • A "why am I not good enough?" feeling; she has to feel she won him over.
  • Competition anxiety: if other women pursue him, he must be high value. SMV is defined as how other women perceive you, not money, looks, or status ("a basement that smells like Doritos" with women lining up beats a Lambo).
  • The "what if" factor and urgency around his limited time, which he says is how female arousal (claimed to be mental/emotional rather than visual) is triggered.

The framing he sells

  • "Women never exit when a man is unapologetic in his actions"; an unrepentant cheater reads as Alpha, a "successful risk-taker."
  • The loyal, honest, providing nice guy gets his loyalty mistaken for having no options and his gestures read as insecurity; "she will despise you for treating her well."
  • He cites Dr. Dre, Steph Curry, Jeff Bezos, Brad and Angelina, and Channing Tatum divorces as evidence that even high-status loyalty fails.
  • Closing reframe: men are not weak but ignorant; wisdom is accepting these truths and treating dating like progressive overload in the gym.

Note: the title and thesis advocate cheating/lying as attraction strategy; the body presents it as describing female nature, not only as tactics to deploy.

Reception

  • Polarized. Many call it brutal but true and thank the speaker; one urges men to watch it "20 times."
  • A heavily-liked top comment rejects the premise morally: a woman who gravitates to liars/cheaters is not worth a long-term relationship.
  • Multiple personal anecdotes claim confirmation -- including a married commenter who admitted cheating, refused to apologize, and says his wife stayed.
  • Notably, the creator's own reply pushes back on his own framing ("false -- they will try as hard as possible to get this type to fully commit"), and a commenter retorts that the fix is willpower to say no, not cold games.
  • Recurring dissent that this describes only "loose," narcissistic, or borderline women, and that healthy women from good families would not tolerate it.