Skip to content

Can You "Trick" Someone Into Being Attracted to You? Yes, You Can

Channel: Gentle Path Forward
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_E_NukhDMz8

The speaker, a practicing therapist and psychology doctoral student, argues that physiological arousal (fear or excitement) can be misinterpreted as attraction, temporarily boosting dating odds. She reviews several misattribution-of-arousal studies and suggests this can be used benignly to liven up a first date or add novelty to a marriage.

Key points

Core claim

  • You can temporarily "trick" someone into attraction by triggering physiological arousal that gets misinterpreted as attraction.
  • People don't always know what causes their bodily reactions (e.g. a pounding heart, a rush) and may consciously mislabel them as attraction.
  • The speaker says manipulation isn't healthy and she doesn't endorse it, but frames the effect as usable for an exciting first date or to add novelty to a struggling marriage.

1974 bridge study (original)

  • Two bridges: one stable, one shaky and fear-arousing. Male participants were approached by a female interviewer who gave a survey and her contact info.
  • Men on the shaky bridge called her back more often and reported more attraction than men on the stable bridge.
  • Interpreted as fear-driven arousal being misattributed to attraction to the woman.

1981 replication

  • Directly replicated the bridge paradigm with improvements, notably controlling time spent on the bridge.
  • Results held and reportedly strengthened the original claim.

2019 roller coaster study (modern)

  • People rated dates as more attractive right after fear-arousing situations (roller coasters, scary movies).
  • May also reflect feeling safe/protected; physical contact during fear (e.g. grabbing onto a partner) can increase bonding.

1962 two-factor theory of emotions

  • Emotion = physiological arousal + cognitive interpretation.
  • Participants were injected with adrenaline or placebo and informed or misinformed about side effects; those with unexplained arousal labeled it (happy or angry) based on situational cues.
  • Speaker notes this study is old, has methodological issues, and should be replicated.

Mechanism and limits

  • Arousal alone doesn't determine emotion, but people must interpret it, and they often misinterpret it when the source is ambiguous.
  • When the source is unclear, people borrow cues from their environment, including social cues.
  • Under cognitive load or distraction, arousal can be misdirected; over time people may reflect and find the true cause, so the effect is short-term.
  • Context matters: expectations, views on romance, awareness of the cause, and stress level all influence the outcome.

Practical suggestions

  • First-date ideas that create arousal (scary movies, roller coasters, exciting activities).
  • Ramping up romance, holding hands, or romantic conversation during arousing moments can help "get a foot in the door" with someone not yet giving you a chance.
  • Add novel, arousing experiences to a stale marriage.

Real-world examples cited

  • Women in abusive relationships sometimes can't distinguish love from fear, allegedly because parents tied both strongly together.
  • Couples therapy: a husband stressed at work gets more irritated at his wife's minor behaviors, combining work stress with relationship annoyance.