Skip to content

THIS Is What Avoidants Secretly Want To Hear After You Stop Chasing

Channel: Chris Seiter
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fy7gfR4hFVU

Framed as a 16-bit "boss battle," the video lists specific phrases that supposedly deactivate an avoidant's fight-or-flight response when a relationship escalates, then argues those phrases only stop you losing - real progress requires slow trust rebuilding.

Key points

  • The premise. An avoidant partner is cast as a video-game "boss" that reappears at every relationship milestone with shields and attacks. Chasing, begging, or pushing for closeness is the losing strategy; each phase has a "cheat code" phrase that signals safety instead of pressure.
  • Phase 1 - Shield of pressure. Triggered when things escalate too fast (labels, future talk, sudden closeness). Cheat code: "I'm good with how things are right now." Rationale given: humans have a status-quo bias, supercharged in avoidants, so signaling no sudden moves deactivates their panic.
  • Phase 2 - Timer attack. Triggered by deadlines (example client invited her avoidant boyfriend of 10 months to meet her parents; he went busy/silent). Cheat code: "Take your time." Tied to John Bowlby's secure-base theory (children with a secure caregiver explored a new toy; those without froze or clung) and to Deci and Ryan's self-determination theory (participants given autonomy over pace stayed calm; those under strict deadlines panicked).
  • Phase 3 - Future shockwave. "Where is this going?" collapses all time into one demanded answer and triggers avoidance. Cheat code: "We don't have to figure this out today," buying breathing room. Cited to temporal construal theory - people feel safer when the future is framed as distant.
  • Phase 4 - Competence challenge. Every pullback is the avoidant testing whether you can handle them without controlling them. Micromanaging ("let me check every step") triggers defensiveness; cheat code: "I trust you to figure it out," which restores their sense of autonomy and competence.
  • Phase 5 - Distraction cloak. Hovering makes them fade into emotional invisibility. Cheat code: focus on your own life and mission - independence sparks their curiosity and draws them back.
  • The Hades twist - the real work. Using the game Hades as an analogy, Seiter argues the cheat codes only drain half the boss's health; the bar recharges. The cheat codes stop you from losing immediately but do not win a real relationship. The second, harder phase is rebuilding trust.
  • Micro trust deposits. Drawing on John Gottman (trust = a partner repeatedly turning toward you rather than away; the "emotional bank account"), progress comes from small consistent moments: responding with calm validation to a stressed comment, replying "no worries" to a vague "I'm busy" text, mirroring their feelings, following through on tiny promises, and offering choices ("coffee or a walk?") instead of pressure.
  • No permanent victory. Defenses will flare again as you get closer; the claim is that consistent calm/patience shrinks the flare-ups over time. Winning is framed as skillful moment-by-moment play, not a one-time defeat of the "boss."
  • Note: the video invokes named researchers (Bowlby, Deci and Ryan, Gottman) and "studies" but describes them loosely and cites none specifically; the framing is dating-coach advice, and a mid-video coaching/discount pitch was dropped as non-content.

Reception

  • Strongly negative and weary - the top comments overwhelmingly reject the premise that the non-avoidant should do all the accommodating. "Partner please. Not a project!" and "This is crazy advice... Why do we have to cater to them the whole time?" capture the room.
  • Many recount losing themselves in multi-year relationships with avoidants (repeated "3 years / 6 years and I lost myself"), concluding "there is no winning" and advising others to find a healthy partner who fights for the relationship equally.
  • Recurring resentment that no equivalent videos coach avoidants to accommodate anxious partners; commenters say the avoidant puts in zero healing effort while the other walks on eggshells.
  • A minority push back on the pessimism: some report growing stronger and more secure through the process ("New day new me, put me in the game coach"), and one long reflection argues most people are a "project" and mutual security is possible if both do the work.
  • Gamer humor threads throughout: "this boss is bugged, it's completely optional, not worth the loot," and "Hades is an easy boss, avoidants are more like Malenia."