Skip to content

The Weird Things Avoidants Need To Be Happy

Channel: Chris Seiter
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZFVeZmn1cg

Seiter argues that dismissive avoidants need three counterintuitive things to be happy in a relationship: distance as a love language, control over their own space, and an ongoing cycle of approach and withdrawal.

Key points

  • The sixth love language: distance. Beyond Gary Chapman's five love languages (words of affirmation, physical touch, gifts, quality time, acts of service), he claims avoidants have a sixth one -- distance. The closeness that makes secure people feel safe makes avoidants feel insecure and engulfed.
  • He uses a Reddit post from an avoidant who broke up with "the love of her life" after pandemic quarantine gave her a taste of space; she now wonders if a traditional relationship is possible for her at all.
  • The invisible fence theory. He compares the ideal avoidant partner to a dog kept in by an invisible fence: present but not imposing. The partner is trained by repeated "shocks" (pullbacks) to stay within boundaries the avoidant controls. Respecting that controlled distance is what lets the avoidant feel safe enough to come closer on their own.
  • Explore and exploit. Borrowing the explore/exploit tradeoff from machine learning (reinforcement learning, multi-armed bandit problems), he maps avoidant behavior to six phases: explore (tentative closeness), exploit (retreat to familiar distance for safety), balancing the two, exploration fatigue plus exploitation guilt, getting stuck in exploit mode, and the resulting on-again off-again pattern.
  • He argues avoidants do not seek balance the way most daters do; their drive for intimacy and their drive for distance stay in a constant warring state, so they default to distance and miss lasting connection.
  • He draws a parallel to narcissists and the "uncanny valley" effect: the mechanical push-pull and "almost there but not quite" warmth can feel unsettling, though he notes not all avoidants are narcissists.
  • He says the more useful question is not whether to bother with avoidants but how a secure person would respond when one pulls away.

Reception

  • Predominantly negative toward avoidants; many commenters say dealing with them is a waste of time and advise leaving rather than trying to connect.
  • A recurring theme that avoidants should "just date each other," with jokes about breadcrumbs, space, and one day a month together.
  • Several describe the push-pull cycle as exhausting and nervous-system-wrecking, including a long top comment about restarting connection every few weeks.
  • Some report the "distance" actually meant the avoidant was talking to or monkey-branching to someone else.
  • A minority share more hopeful or balanced takes: setting boundaries, not chasing, focusing on self-worth, or one commenter five months into making it work through communication.