Skip to content

Stop Comparing Yourself to Other People (Here's Why)

Channel: HealthyGamerGG
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nujgUpYIVOE

Comparison is an evolved brain function that has gotten hijacked, especially by social media; you stop it not by fighting the comparison itself but by questioning why your brain picked that person and by addressing the negative emotion that activated your ego in the first place.

Key points

Why "just spend less time on social media" fails - Standard wellness advice (less Instagram/Facebook) is effective in theory but very hard to implement, so it doesn't help. Better to understand why comparison feels addictive and where it comes from.

Social comparison theory - We make two kinds of comparisons, each with a purpose. Upward comparison (to someone "better") is meant to build a roadmap for self-improvement. Downward comparison (to someone "worse") is an emotional coping strategy that makes you feel better in the moment. - Both malfunction when they get out of control: unhealthy upward comparisons shatter motivation ("everyone at the gym is ripped, why bother") instead of guiding you; chronic downward comparisons trap you in a cycle of feeling superior (e.g. blaming low game rank on "noobs") while never actually improving.

How the brain picks who to compare to - You don't compare yourself to elephants, ants, or heads of state - only to people your mind files in "your league" (classmates, siblings, friends, colleagues). - Social media has broken this: parasocial access to creators' and strangers' curated lives tricks the brain into filing them into your league, so you compare your real life to their crafted highlight reel - an unwinnable comparison with no A-to-Z path to imitate. - You also don't compare one-to-one; you assemble one person's best relationship, another's finances, a third's fitness, a fourth's cooking, and measure yourself against that composite - guaranteeing you lose.

Fix 1: interrogate the selection - When you catch a comparison, ask "why did my brain choose this person? what makes this feel fair?" Tunneling into it usually exposes the comparison as unfair or incomplete (e.g. the creator has staff, mods, a whole support team). Dismantling the justification that you're "in the same league" makes the comparison lose its grip.

Fix 2: yogic psychology - the ego (ahamkar) - Dr K shifts from science to yogic psychology, which he values for being about subjective application within you rather than objective principle (knowing a cognitive bias exists doesn't change your behavior). - The ahamkar (ego) is the part of the mind that makes comparisons. Identity itself is comparative - tall only exists against short, success against failure, "doctor" against other professions. He notes how in Indian/East/South Asian contexts asking someone's profession is a shortcut to "bucket" them for how much respect to give. - The more active the ego, the more comparisons - downward from arrogance, unhealthy upward from low self-worth. - Key move: the ego is a defense mechanism activated by negative emotion. Example: after a breakup you compulsively stalk your ex's social media even though it hurts, because it validates the "I'm a piece of crap" feeling - the ego seeks confirmation/consistency. - So the real fix is to target the negative emotion feeding the comparison - process, accept, or let go of it - rather than fighting the comparison directly. When you're genuinely content, you barely compare at all.

Reception

  • Broadly positive on the framework, but with substantial thoughtful pushback on the "it's not a fair comparison" line.
  • Top comment calls out a perceived hypocrisy: when you're down, people tell you to think of those worse off (a downward comparison), but when comparison hurts you, they tell you comparing is stupid - "can't have it both ways."
  • A highly-liked comment took the idea further: NO comparison is ever fair, even between twins, because everyone is shaped by an endless number of different variables - not better or worse, just incomparable.
  • The most-discussed dissent came from commenters comparing themselves to real, long-known peers, not influencers: "I went to the same schools, knew them a decade... they're doing better in every metric." Repliers pushed back by asking what makes "same school" a fair basis, and by cataloguing hidden differences (family support, socioeconomic starting point). One music-major reply described discovering peers had been raised by professional-musician parents.
  • Recurring point that modern life actively trains comparison (school grades, job applications, dating, social media), so "just stop" is naive. Several noted the advice is a canned response that fails precisely for people with mental-health issues who compare impulsively before they notice.
  • Some raised comparing to your past self as the healthy version; another distinguished using others as examples to get help/improve from ego-driven comparison.