Skip to content

THIS Gets A Response When An Avoidant Stops Contacting You

Channel: Chris Seiter
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZLMGtrpgvY

To get an avoidant ex who has gone quiet to respond, Seiter says you must first identify which of four "dismissive avoidant communication types" you are dealing with, because each requires a different approach.

Key points

  • The premise: a perfectly crafted text fails when you have not matched it to the avoidant's communication style. There are four types (distinct from the four attachment styles).
  • The caveman: responds to everything but with minimal effort -- one-word replies, emojis, "lol", "idk". Rarest type to fully ghost. Fix: replace closed/fact-check questions with open-ended ones that invite opinion or a small story (e.g. "what made you choose the one you have?"), moving from small talk to big talk.
  • The brick wall: never responds, full shutdown. Seiter cites the "free to attach" idea that avoidants only long for an ex once that person is truly unavailable and out of contact. The paradox: wanting them to reply means you have not let go. Contrasts Shirley (still tethered, sends a long emotional text, gets ignored) with Temple (genuinely gave up, the avoidant then notices her absence and feels nostalgia). Brick walls respond to nostalgia, not pressure -- it is about timing, not the words. Letting go is the one thing you control.
  • The customer service rep: answers only logistical or obligatory messages (packages, plans, favors) in a cold, transactional tone; shuts down on anything emotional. Fix: stack positive interactions using the peak-end rule -- end conversations on a high note and end them first, so the interaction is remembered as positive.
  • The firefighter: ignores messages until something feels urgent or dramatic. The community's "damsel in distress" text ("I really only trust you for the answer") triggers a big response. Seiter notes relying on manufactured crisis is not sustainable.
  • Diagnostic cheat sheet: send a message; total silence means a brick wall, while the other three respond in characteristic ways. References the peak-end rule and Kalina Silverman's "Big Talk" small-talk-vs-big-talk framework.

Reception

  • Strongly skeptical, even hostile, toward the video's goal of winning an avoidant back; many top comments urge viewers to walk away rather than strategize.
  • Recurring theme: this is "a lot of work" for someone who "clearly doesn't care," with several calling avoidants boring, exhausting, or not worth the effort.
  • A frequent critique is that Seiter should coach avoidants or anxious attachers to heal rather than coach their partners to chase; one urges facing one's own unhealed trauma instead.
  • The analogies landed well ("trying to get a reaction from a stone statue," "brick walls don't open when you knock harder").
  • Some pushback in the other direction: a few argue avoidants do care deeply and act from fear/self-defense, and several say their ex blended multiple types (e.g. firefighter plus caveman).
  • A minority disputed the firefighter model directly, reporting their avoidant vanished during an actual crisis when needed most.